complex systems. economy. human dignity. ecology. well being. this time in Africa
Friday, February 3, 2012
The African Environmental Economist
For those interested here is the link.
Let me know what you think and please do alert me to any great content that could be posted in future editions.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
The Roaring Augrabies
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Lesotho and leadership
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Botswana, Ghana, Mauritius and South Africa...
| Date: | 2010 |
| By: | Naudé, Wim |
| URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp2010-07&r=afr |
| Botswana, Ghana, Mauritius and South Africa are sub-Saharan African countries that stand out for their development progress. Each of these countries has succeeded against the odds, against expectations. This paper synthesizes the common ingredients of these countries’ success, and derives lessons. It concludes that smallness, landlockedness, tropical location, distance from world markets, racism, colonialism and other challenges can be overcome through appropriate institutions, governance and good economic policies. | |
| Keywords: | sub-Saharan Africa, development, success, country role models See also earlier blogposts "Unmasking Africa's seven success stories" and "Go Gabon" |
Monday, February 22, 2010
Food miles or fair miles
I wish to thank Martin for the opportunity to be guest blogger here again, following a few entries from me in the past (mostly Africa and sustainable tourism related). I wish to this time revisit the slightly related topic of food miles and share a recent report of Oxfam and IIED called "Fair miles - recharting the food miles debate" that focuses on African fruit and vegetable exports to the UK.
As the world continues to grapple with climate change, the “buying local” and “food miles” concepts are intuitively appealing, but especially in colder climates (where it is most popular) it is flawed and simplistic based on a false assumption that transport is the only or major cause of greenhouse gas emissions. This ignores the complexity of the food chain from the seed to the plate. Among the more obvious examples is the energy-intensive industrial-scale cultivation in greenhouses having far more environmental impacts than the African low carbon small-scale producer (with a lot of help from the sun).
Some interesting extracts from the report:
"A tomato grown in Essex in the UK is not necessarily more environmentally friendly... if that Essex tomato needed energy-intense greenhouse cultivation to survive. There are, too, other environmental impacts, such as fertiliser use and soil degradation" (p.9)
"Tara Garnett of the Food Climate Research Network (FCRN) — a UK initiative studying greenhouse gas emissions from the food system — led a recent lifecycle analysis of these emissions in the UK. It suggests that transport accounts for about 10 percent of the food system’s emissions." (p.16)
In contrast:
"Agriculture is a top contributor... according to DEFRA, for 36 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions associated with food consumption in the UK" (p.18).
Even "shopping, storage and preparation" (p.27) accounts for more than transport.
"The vast majority of UK farms derive inputs from outside the UK, and consequently are responsible for greenhouse gas emissions that occur outside their locality as well as outside the UK. For many foods, this poses serious questions about their ‘local’ credibility" (p.14)
"To begin to fully understand the social and environmental effects of our food choices, we need to take a look at the entire food supply chain — from farm to manufacturer, to wholesaler or distributor, to retailer, to individual — and the energy use, emissions, and livelihood opportunities associated with each step of that convoluted journey" (p 13)
To really drive home the message that we need to be more holistic than counting the “food miles”, the livelihood dimension is added as final element in the last quote above. The report concludes:
"Kenyans contribute very little to the global emissions burden. And what is more, the entire airfreight trade in fruits and vegetables between the UK and Kenya adds a mere 0.1 per cent to the UK’s total emissions. Given the industrialised world’s historical responsibility for emissions, and its current high per capita emissions, is reducing its carbon footprint from 10.60 to 10.59 tonnes really worth imperilling 1 to 1.5 million livelihoods?" (p.33)
This trade-off is the kind of question that environmental economists need to explore further. Are we in a real inevitable trade-off situation, or is there even a way of minimizing carbon emmisions from African agriculture for export without affecting livelihoods?
Some related articles on this topic from Times online, Prospect magazine and a UK government report from DEFRA and DFID. (Guest blog contribution by Gerhard Buttner: Development and Ecotourism Consultant - South Africa, Mexico and the UK)
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Transit delays impacts on African exports
| Date: | 2010-01-01 |
| By: | Freund, Caroline Rocha, Nadia |
| URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:5184&r=afr |
| This paper examines the effects of transit, documentation, and ports and customs delays on Africa’s exports. The authors find that transit delays have the most economically and statically significant effect on exports. A one-day reduction in inland travel times leads to a 7 percent increase in exports. Put another way, a one-day reduction in inland travel times translates to a 1.5 percentage point decrease in all importing-country tariffs. By contrast, longer delays in the other areas have a far smaller impact on trade. The analysis controls for the possibility that greater trade leads to shorter delays in three ways. First, it examines the effect of trade times on exports of new products. Second, it evaluates the effect of delays in a transit country on the exports of landlocked countries. Third, it examines whether delays affect time-sensitive goods relatively more. The authors show that large transit delays are relat ively more harmful because of high within-country variation. This is a key issue in the food security question (see here for earlier blogpost on the determinants of hunger in SADC). | |
Friday, November 20, 2009
Southern African Regional Climate Change Programme
Future life in Southern Africa will depend on the ability of both the environment and the population to adapt to warmer temperatures and greater unpredictability in weather patterns. This variability is already having a negative impact on progress toward the Millennium Development Goals of water, agriculture, health and energy."
Friday, November 13, 2009
Africa's Infrastructure Challenge

Thursday, October 15, 2009
Hunger in sub-Saharan Africa
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Adaptation!?
According to the conventional wisdom of many environmental campaigners, we should first do everything we can to mitigate global warming, and only then focus on adaptation strategies. This seems wrong – even immoral – if we could do more for people and the planet through adaptation.
Read here for full article.
Read here for the background economic analysis supporting the article.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Fragile Growth
Office of the Chief Economist, Africa Region, The World Bank, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 20433, USA
* Corresponding author: Jorge Saba Arbache. E-mail: jarbache@worldbank.org.
Has Africa finally reached the path to sustained growth? We find that much of the improvement in economic performance in Africa after 1995 is attributable to a substantial reduction in the frequency and severity of growth declines in all economies and an increase in growth accelerations in mineral-rich economies. We find, however, that growth accelerations have not been generally accompanied by improvements in variables often correlated withlong run growth, such as investment. We also fail to find evidence that substantial policy and governance improvements were associated with the post-1995 accelerations. We conclude that Africa's growth recovery remains fragile.
In an earlier post it was argued that sub-Saharan growth is largely achieved by a depletion of capital. It does not seem that the badly needed investments to maintain or expand the regions' productive base is realising. It was also pointed out earlier that economic growth does not lead to meaningful gains in social development.
The conclusion becomes stronger that the gains of growth in sub-Saharan Africa is dissipating. One of the reasons could be the high volatility of growth in Africa.
The obvious response is to question growth in itself, but to lift millions of people out of poverty growth is needed. Not less growth, but more (inclusive, transparent and environmentally friendly) growth is what Africa needs.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Low income countries benefit from open access
From Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE) website:
Online Access to Research in the Environment
Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE), an international public-private consortium coordinated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Yale University, and leading science and technology publishers, enables developing countries to gain access to one of the world's largest collections of environmental science research.
Over 2,990 peer reviewed titles (as of 4/2009) owned and published by over 340 prestigious publishing houses and scholarly societies are now available in more than 100 low income countries. Research is provided in a wide range of disciplines, including Biology; Biotechnology, Genetics & Genetically Modified Species; Botany & Plant Biodiversity; Climatology, Climate Change & Meteorology; Ecology & Wildlife Conservation; Energy Conservation & Renewable Energy; Environmental Chemistry; Environmental & Natural Resource Economics; Environmental Engineering; Environmental Law, Policy & Planning; Fish & Fisheries; Forests & Forestry; Geography, Population Studies & Migration; Geology & Earth Sciences; Natural Environmental Disasters; Oceanography & Marine Biology; Pollution & Environmental Toxicology; Satellite & Remote Sensing Technologies; Soil Sciences and Desertification; Waste Management; Water, Hydrology & Wetlands; and Zoology & Animal Biodiversity.
Friday, July 31, 2009
The Future is Africa?

Friday, July 10, 2009
Carbon emissions: what is a fair share?
Thursday, March 26, 2009
A solution for Africa's natural resource curse?
The central argument made by the report is that African governments have not been able to optimize the mining tax revenue due to them before the 2003 to 2008 price boom; neither have they been able to capture the anticipated windfalls during the price boom. This argument is grounded on two main reasons: (i) Mining companies operating in Africa are granted too many tax subsidies and concessions (ii) There is high incidence of tax avoidance by mining companies conditioned by such measures as secret mining contracts, corporate mergers and acquisitions, and various ‘creative’ accounting mechanisms. These two factors coupled with inadequate institutional capacity to ensure tax compliance contribute in a large measure to diminish the tax revenue due to African governments.tax revenue from the mining industry.
The report highlights how to improve the situation from a state-revenue side. This is only one part of the story though. More money into state coffers can help address development objectives, but certainly does not guarantee it. Maybe a follow-up report on how government efficiency and transparency is needed to responsibly invest these revenues in meeting development objectives? (see also AfriMap for existing initiatives in this regard).
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
The smell of Africa
Monday, December 1, 2008
Poverty and violence
Monday, November 24, 2008
Steady increase in greenhouse gases
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Poverty in sub-Saharan Africa: Hydrocarbons to the rescue?
WORLD ENERGY OUTLOOK 2008 FACT SHEET: SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
Could revenues in oil- and gas-rich sub-Saharan African countries
alleviate energy poverty?
n Oil and gas exports in the top-ten producing sub-Saharan African countries are set
to grow steadily to 2030, providing the means for alleviating poverty and expanding
energy access. In the Reference Scenario, in which no change in government policies is
assumed, their oil exports rise from 5.1 mb/d in aggregate in 2007 to 6.4 mb/d in 2030. Gas
exports, largely as liquefied natural gas (LNG), increase from 21.6 bcm in 2006 to 130 bcm
in 2030. These projections hinge on a reduction in gas flaring, adequate investment and
avoidance of disruption to supplies through civil unrest. The ten countries flared 40 bcm
in 2005 — almost three times the entire region’s gas consumption. These countries could
make direct use of their gas resources by using currently flared gas for power generation
or distributing it in cities. The liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) extracted from natural gas or
produced in refineries can provide a low-cost source of supply for distribution networks.
n Less than a third of households in the majority of oil- and gas-rich countries have access
to electricity or to clean fuels for cooking, like LPG, kerosene, biogas and ethanol
gelfuel. About 150 000 people, mainly women and children, die prematurely each year in
these countries because of indoor air pollution from burning traditional fuels – essentially
fuelwood and charcoal – for cooking in inefficient stoves or open fires. In the absence of new
policy initiatives, the number of people living without electricity and relying on fuelwood
and charcoal for cooking rises over the Outlook period, as the population grows.
n Government revenues from oil and gas are set to rise strongly, giving these countries
the means to speed up economic and social development and alleviate poverty. The
government take in the top ten oil- and gas-producing countries is projected to rise from
some $80 billion in 2006 to about $250 billion in 2030. Nigeria and Angola account for 86%
of the $4.1 trillion cumulative revenues of all ten countries over 2006-2030. All these
countries desperately need sustained and sustainable economic development. Modern
energy services are a crucial prerequisite, bringing major benefits to public health, social
welfare and economic productivity. In most of the countries, improving energy access
will entail fundamental political, institutional and legislative reform, as well as efforts
to strengthen the capability of regional and local authorities to implement programmes
and to expand access to credit.
n The upfront cost of expanding access to modern energy is small relative to the wealth
that these countries’ hydrocarbon resources will generate. An estimated $18 billion is
needed to achieve universal access to electricity and to LPG cooking stoves and cylinders
– a mere 0.4% of the projected cumulative government revenues from oil and gas export
revenues in 2007-2030. The cost relative to the government take in Equatorial Guinea,
Angola and Gabon is only 0.1%.
n Sub-Saharan Africa’s hydrocarbon-resource wealth will lead to economic development
only if governments manage wisely and honestly the development of the sector
and the revenues that accrue. An improvement in the efficiency and transparency of
revenue allocation and the accountability of governments in the use of public funds
would improve the likelihood that oil and gas revenues are actually used to alleviate
poverty generally and energy poverty specifically.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Air travel to Africa and climate change
This raises the question of what would happen in poorer countries of Africa (and elsewhere) which rely on tourism for much-needed international revenue and regard tourism as important part of their development strategy, if tourists would stop coming due to changes in air travel regulations. One helpful suggestion for tourists is given on the topic by an Africa specialist travel agency Rainbow Tours, which forms part of the Ethical Tour Operators Group in the UK:
"It is estimated that one new job is created by every eight tourists, and one job supports up to twenty people. In modern times, flying is an essential part of any trip to Africa, and if people were to stop visiting Africa because of a desire to cut down on flying, the effect on communities would be catastrophic. In many areas, tourism offers the only chance of employment and hope for the future.
Maybe a solution is to travel less and for longer. Make one longer visit, instead of two. We don’t offer long-weekends in Zanzibar, or in Cape Town. Cut out the flights you can afford to go without – to Edinburgh or Paris – and travel by train. Cut out the short-break in Barcelona, turn down the central heating and wear a jumper, but please don’t stop visiting Africa. They need you there."
However, it is clear that this issue also needs to be tackled at an international level far beyond the individual traveler´s decision-making , taking into account the relative importance of tourism for development in a tourist host region and even the much lower average carbon emission levels of the poorer host country rather than only the levels of the country of origin of the tourists.
H/T: Ron Mader - planeta.com, Green Travel Network